Historical past Or Myth?

Historical past Or Myth?

07/15/2011 01:22 pm ET Up to date Sep 14, 2011
5.3k
Jeffrey Small Writer, "The Jericho Deception" and "The Breath of God"
While you hear the phrase "myth" related to the Bible, what is the first thought that comes to your thoughts?
Many use the time period myth in a pejorative sense to mean that the stories described will not be factually true. Others define myth as non-historical tales that comprise an ethical message. Both of those definitions miss the richness of the term. Mythology is a form of literature that expresses basic truths in a way that abnormal discourse is insufficient to describe. The stories that make up the myths are often anchored in some historic actuality, however this need not be so. Mythology adds a richness of element and a concreteness to metaphorical language. Studying Biblical stories as mythology offers me the freedom to know their underlying that means in a way I by no means did when I used to be taught as a baby that these tales had been factually true.
Why do most fashionable students reject a reading of the Bible as history a lot less as literal reality?
1. In an age of science and technology, too much of the Bible is solely unbelievable to immediately's thoughts and turns folks away from the underlying messages. From a scientific standpoint, lots of the "info" within the Bible are simply incorrect. Considered one of many examples: according to Genesis, the universe is simply over 6000 years previous. In accordance with physics, the Massive Bang occurred thirteen.7 billion years in the past.
2. Lots of the tales are also scientifically not possible, like the tale of Joshua stopping the sun transferring across the sky. This story assumes (as was the pondering then) that the earth was flat and was at the heart of the universe. We simply know this to be false. Second, for the sun to stop would imply that the earth must stop rotating on its axis - an event which would destroy the planet.
three. For many of the miracle tales, pure explanations exist. The authors of these stories lived in an age when folks believed that solar eclipses have been divine omens, illness was divine punishment, and mental illness was attributable to demon possession. In the case of Jesus, therapeutic was an important a part of his ministry. Nonetheless, at the moment we will find religion healers in Haiti who practice voodoo and in tribal Africa who apply witchcraft. Many of those modern-day faith healers have patients who are actually healed by these practices. Doctors call this the placebo impact, an impact so powerful that medication must bear double blind experiments.
four. Among the mythological tales in the Bible should not authentic, but had been borrowed from other traditions. The Epic of Gilgamesh - a Sumerian poem detailing the creation of the universe that predates the writings of Genesis by many centuries - accommodates a flood story whose plot factors are almost similar to the story of Noah.
5. The opposite world religions additionally include wealthy histories of mythology and fantastical sounding (to us) stories. On what basis can we Christians declare that our miracle stories are professional, yet theirs are flights of fancy? The mythology surrounding the Buddha, who lived 500 years earlier than Jesus, consists of tales of how he healed the sick, walked on water, and flew through the air. His delivery was foretold by a spirit (a white elephant fairly than the angel Gabriel) who then entered his mom's womb! At his start, wise males predicted that he would develop into a fantastic religious chief. Twentieth-century students Mircea Eliade and Joseph Campbell wrote that certain archetypal non secular myths are discovered throughout cultures, histories, and religions. Examples include the Cosmic Tree, the Virgin BIrth, and The Resurrection.
6. The Bible itself is full of inconsistencies. How can it be an correct historical report, when the assorted books contradict one another? Here is UNC Religion Professor Bart Ehrman :
"Just take the loss of life of Jesus. What day did Jesus die on and what time of day? Did he die on the day before the Passover meal was eaten, as John explicitly says, or did he die after it was eaten, as Mark explicitly says? Did he die at midday, as in John, or at 9 a.m., as in Mark? Did Jesus carry his cross the entire manner himself or did Simon of Cyrene carry his cross? It depends which Gospel you read. Did both robbers mock Jesus on the cross or did solely considered one of them mock him and the other come to his defense? It depends which Gospel you learn. Did the curtain in the temple rip in half before Jesus died or after he died? It relies upon which Gospel you learn.. Or take the accounts of the resurrection. Who went to the tomb on the third day? Was it Mary alone or was it Mary with other ladies? If it was Mary with different women, what number of other girls had been there, which ones were they, and what were their names? Was the stone rolled away earlier than they bought there or not? What did they see within the tomb? Did they see a man, did they see two men, or did they see an angel? It relies upon which account you learn."
7. Studying the Bible as a literal historical account of occasions from the past limits the facility of these stories. Moderately than expressing universal truths, a literal interpretation limits the actions of God to sure occasions in historical past. God's actions in the world change into finite, confined to certain historical occasions: like the chess grasp making individual strikes on a chessboard frozen in time two thousand years ago. Reading these similar stories mythologically, nonetheless, can deliver forth their universal qualities.
eight. A literal studying of the Bible alienates much of our society. The stories had been written in a different age with totally different views on social justice - an age wherein slavery was official, an age when discrimination based mostly on gender, race, ethnicity, and sexual orientation was the norm. Too typically due to this history, the Bible is used to justify intolerance at this time.
Reading the Bible as mythology is just not a brand new concept. Two of the early Church Fathers, Origen (185-254 AD) and Augustine (354-430 AD), both interpreted Genesis metaphorically, rejecting literal interpretations. Early in the 20th century, German theologian Rudolf Bultmann called for a "demythologizing" of the New Testomony for lots of the causes given above. Reasonably, the movement in lots of fundamentalist circles at present to read the Bible as inerrant (an extreme type of literalism, through which each word of Bible is considered as true) is a late development from the 19th century as a response to the chipping away at the historicity of the tales since the Enlightenment.
I fear that an insistence on a literal or historic studying of the Bible will finally lead to the irrelevance of Christianity in our society. By throwing off the shackles of getting to imagine in the historicity of the Bible, we are free to interpret the stories as a testomony to the spiritual experiences of individuals from a different age - a testomony that communicates a which means about their experiences of Ultimate Reality, of God. I understand that their experiences of the divine ground of their lives have been interpreted by the lens of a pre-trendy view of the world, and my very own spiritual experiences will tackle a special form at present.
Follow Jeffrey Small on Twitter: /jeffreysmalljr
Extra:
SUBSCRIBE TO & COMPLY WITH RELIGION
Get high stories and blog posts emailed to me each day. Newsletters could supply personalised content or ads. Be taught more
Newsletter
NEW! HIGHLIGHT AND SHARE
Part of HuffPost MultiCultural