The Delusion Of The Virgen De Guadalupe

The Delusion Of The Virgen De Guadalupe

Up to date on January 26, 2012
The original image as found on Juan Diego's tilma...supposedly. Supply
A National Symbol
The Virgen de Guadalupe is an icon of the Mexican people. She is greater than a version of the Mother of God, she is their national image. What many do not know is that this goddess that's revered and regarded a Christian deity is definitely a hybrid of Christian mythology and an historical Nahua goddess known as Tonantzin. Much more interesting is how this fable came to be within the first place. The parable that supposedly happened in 1531, was never even heard of till 1648 and was created by a Creole, not a Nahua Indian. On this article I hope to enlighten the reader and separate the truth from the parable.
My Qualifications
Before we get into the nitty gritty of this event, you'd be smart to ask what makes me an skilled on this subject. Good query! I'm at the moment a student in my second yr at UMKC working in direction of a masters in Advantageous Arts in Artistic Writing with a second major in Historical past. Also, this previous semester I studied under Dr. Viviana Grieco, an expert on the Spanish Conquest. My analysis matter for this course was, guess what-the Virgen de Guadalupe. So, while I had carried out some analysis alone previous to my formal research, the information I am about to provide you comes from educational primary and secondary sources, all of which I will cite on the finish. Now, lets get right down to the juicy stuff.
The Fantasy
In response to the myth, in 1531 on a December Saturday morning, a humble Nahua named Juan Diego was on his approach to church to be evangelized when he heard birds singing up on the hill of Tepeyac. Curious, he went up the hill and saw earlier than him a ravishing girl surrounded by shiny shining light. Her message was simple: she wished that a temple be built in her identify on the hill of Tepeyac. From there she would make it recognized to all that she is the protectress of the Mexican Nation. She instructed Juan Diego to take this message to the bishop and reluctantly, he agreed, however the bishop did not consider him. Juan Diego returned to Tepeyac and instructed the woman what occurred and he or she instructed him to return the following day. The subsequent day, Sunday, he returned to deliver the message to the bishop and was once once more acquired with doubt. The bishop requested for proof. On Monday Juan Diego, now lacking confidence, avoided Tepeyac all collectively and he tried to do the identical on Tuesday, however in some way, she discovered him. He informed her how the bishop wished proof so she instructed him to go up on the hill and decide flowers. This was an odd request as a result of it was December and there have been no flowers to be found that point of yr, however certain sufficient, just over the hill, he discovered every form of rare flower he could consider. Obeying the command he picked several flowers and put them in his tilma, sort of like a pancho. This time, when he went to the bishop he opened his tilma and instead of flowers there was a picture of the Virgen de Guadalupe there—proof enough for the skeptical bishop. So that is how the story goes.
The Fact
The reality could be very completely different. Really, there isn't a point out of this myth till 1648 when Miguel Sanchez published it. The supposed bishop in the story was Bishop Juan de Zumarraga who, while a real historical character, was not the bishop in Mexico at the time. In actual fact, Zumarraga is the one real character within the story as a result of there isn't a proof of there ever having been a Juan Diego. And Zumarraga, in all his data as an inquisitor and even later when he did lastly grow to be bishop, makes no point out of this miracle. Humorous how something that will have seemingly have had such an affect on a person goes unmentioned for over 100 years till it is written down as a second hand account. Another indisputable fact is that the picture is synthetic. There is nothing different worldly about it. All the paints and the material can be traced again to the paints and textiles that have been common at the time. In fact, the picture even has an author; Marcos Cipac. It is pretty onerous to claim heavenly divinity when the merchandise in query could be very human.
Nahua Goddess
However here is the true kicker. The hill of Tepeyac was originally the location of a Nahua temple to honor Tonantzin, a Nahua goddess. The year 1531 can also be suspicious as a result of it was just ten years after Cortez's conquest and the highest precedence of the Spaniards was to convert the Nahuas to Christianity. It's extremely attainable that Nahuas continued to make pilgrimages to the hill of Tepeyac to honor their Nahua goddess, and the Catholic monks and friars, of their haste to transform them, declared that Tonantzin was really a Christian goddess. That is more plausible than the whole miracle thing.
The Unhappy Actuality
All of this evidence and analysis will do no good when confronting a Mexican patriot, though. The Virgen de Guadalupe is not just a non secular image, as I mentioned before, she is a patriotic one. My favorite quote on this subject can greatest summarize this phenomenon: The Mexican folks, after more than two centuries of experiments and defeats, have faith only in the Virgen of Guadalupe and the Nationwide Lottery.” (Octavio Paz) Most people will take offense if any of those facts are introduced up. In truth, even the Vatican took situation with these claims and their response was to beatify Juan Diego, regardless that NO proof exists for both the myth or his existence. When historians, reminiscent of Stafford Poole, write articles on this highly sensitive subject, they're assailed with insults. So, I find myself in the same place by publishing this...but I welcome the onslaught.
For those who discovered this text fascinating, other articles by Stafford Poole on this matter might interest you as nicely.
Books by Stafford Poole
References
Peterson, Jeanette Favrot. "Creating the Virgin of Guadalupe: The Fabric, The Artist, and Sources." The Americas Volume 61, Quantity four, April 2005: pp. 571-610.
Poole, Stafford. "Historical past versus Juan Diego." The Americas, Vol. sixty two, No. 1 July 2005: 1-16.
—. Our Girl of Guadalupe, The Origins and Sources of a Mexican National Image, 1531-1797. Tucson: University of Arizona Press, 1995.
More on the Virgen de Guadalupe
More by this Author
6
Please Vote Up!!! 66 comments
HattieMattieMae 4 years in the past from Limburg, Netherlands
hmm...I studied this before, as a result of I was brought up Catholic, as well as Medjugorie, and Fatima, Lourdes, and so forth. I don't believe it's a myth, but many miracles happen on a regular basis. I obtained such a present from Medjugorje, so I'm a believer in Our Lady. I've read many books, and investigations in varied places for years. While everyone seems to be entitled to their own beliefs and opinions, I really do not agree with this hub anymore than the Mexican people would. It isn't about Patriotism. It's extra about believing in a better power than yourself and God is what they name it, where Our Girl is an intercessor and brings a message of peace and like to all nations. There has been many healings, and totally different miracles out of many of those tales. I know some people in my very own town.
emmaspeaks four years ago from Kansas City
Writer
Hattie, this isn't an invite to convert me. If you have some educational data that may apply to this subject, I welcome it. I will not enable any extra comments from you if all you might have are your personal personal beliefs. They are no extra related than my opinion of the colour blue.
Daniella Lopez four years ago from Arkansas
Fantastic and informative hub, Emma! I love the perspective that you have written this in. Voted up!
Zena four years ago
I hate how christians use scare tactics. Glad you set this up.
emmaspeaks 4 years in the past from Kansas Metropolis
Author
St.Cyprian 4 years in the past
Excellent hub. I've by no means heard the "true story" before and it certainly is a more plausible one. I think individuals who have experiences with this energy will discover the tutorial part to be only educational. Lots of powerful miracles are related to Our Lady and different manifestations of Mary by any name. It's hard to override individuals's private experiences with one thing like this utilizing more unprovable ancient "information."
I'm a fan of each Guadalupe and La Santisima Muerte - now there's an fascinating history! And, she, too has many miracles related together with her. Hers is a really powerful energy that goes again to the traditional Aztecs.
Accolades!
Creator
Effectively, thanks, St. Cyprian, but as I mentioned earlier than, personal beliefs and experiences are private, and can't be used as a measuring stick for anyone else. That you will have had some expertise with regard to this deity can no extra be proven than someone else's expertise with Buddha, for example. My comment that that I welcome academic critique stands because that IS a measuring stick that can apply to every part regarding the historicity of this "event".
HattieMattieMae four years ago from Limburg, Netherlands
Well personally I do not attempt to convert anybody, if you've learn enough of my very own hubs you'll know this, but this is precisely why I don't normally get entangled with most articles or forums on such things as this. I've studied many religions, and beliefs. I never convert anybody, and I consider everybody should comply with their own paths. For me I just respect all religions, cultures, and folks. I've stated that enough instances on hubpages. You must have expected most people who read your hub, are going to tell you what they've experienced whether they are atheist,angostic,non secular,non secular or what ever. It does not matter to me in the event you go away my comments. I'm a peaceful person, and most of the people know this too, on hubpages. I stay neutral in all territories, as a result of each is their own expertise and path. So in the event you felt I was trying to transform you, all I'll ever do is let you know to be your true self, and observe your personal interior compass.
emmaspeaks four years in the past from Kansas City
Creator
"all I will ever do is inform you to be your true self," How am I not being true to myself? It seems like you've gotten made a very hasty judgment. And after reading this text, anybody who insists that beliefs are relevant, missed the purpose of this text.
St.Cyprian 4 years in the past
I do not think any tutorial critique may be made here... you will have set forth some details, as such. And, there they are. That is great info, however it is only that. What sort of educational argument are you anticipating?
One thing like this: There's a parallel between the unifying legend of Our Girl in Mexico and the unifying legend of King Arthur in England. The details of each are controversial, as a result of they're misplaced in the mists of time. Although, it's attainable that such individuals as those concerned in the story might have existed, according to many specialists. Both legends appear to contain a mixture of facts and fiction and are an necessary a part of every tradition's historical past. To attack these concepts is to assault the folks, their tradition and their very essence.
There you go.
When you attack people at their core, you are going to get an unpleasant reaction...I am not Christian, Catholic or Mexican. I just try to be an honest individual. It is laborious to know why folks make full on assaults and then surprise why they're getting flak.
Pcunix four years in the past from SE MA
Every "miracle" is from the same root cause: idiot extra individuals.
I love that these of us feel that truth "attacks" them. It does - it attacks their foolishness.
emmaspeaks 4 years ago from Kansas City
Author
Thanks Pcunix. It occurs every time. I'm used to it. But St. Cyprian, these details are far from lost within the mists of time. There are data and historical archives. I feel you are underneath the impression that we now have to rely solely on what facts have been handed down, and that's merely not the case. I might be a very poor historian if that had been all I needed to go on. The actual fact is that there are data. There's a wealth of evidence. My point with this text was to point out easy methods to some, equivalent to your self, and even the Vatican, proof doesn't matter. Solely beliefs matter, and that may be a tragedy. So far as educational critique goes, I welcome any new info somebody might have. Granted, I just spent the past semester immersed in all the brand new information there may be on the market, however people make discoveries daily, so I welcome that. Private beliefs don't have any place in historical past. As a historian, I'm not here to go judgment, so my private beliefs stay out of this. I solely current the details.
hecate-horus 4 years in the past from Rowland Woods
Good article. Many Christian customs and symbols stem from Pagan roots;in truth, as I've mentioned before, most of our Christmas traditions are from Pagan beliefs. It is a hard incontrovertible fact that the Catholic church used Pagan holidays and switched round Pagan tales to help convert folks. Christians quite stick their heads within the sand about it.
emmaspeaks 4 years ago from Kansas Metropolis
Author
Thank you Hecate-horus. I agree, and some of these comments replicate your assertion.
Simone Smith 4 years in the past from San Francisco
Positively fascinating! I had not been conscious of the Virgen de Guadalupe's origins before, nor was I conscious of the reality behind the myth. Is not it wonderful how folklore evolves and modifications over time, and how propaganda can morph into completely different kinds over time? Thanks so much for the great Hub. Voted up and attention-grabbing!
emmaspeaks four years in the past from Kansas City
Creator
Thank you Simone! I've had an interest in the Guadalupe fantasy ever since I was a baby so it is extremely satisfying to be able to write about it now. I will proceed to take action, even though some would somewhat not hear in regards to the facts.
FUSION four years ago
You will need to have appeared up the data in all of the incorrect places. The Virgin had good cause to appear at that individual hill, To crush the pagan beliefs of tonantzin and all the native pagan deities. This is represented in her standing on the moon. The moon was seen as a source the place deities might be invoked. In fact there was no Juan Diego in any records. His official name was an indigineous one (do not His Baptized/christianized title was Juan Diego. You might want to analysis the history of the indigenous folks and their pagan beliefs before you get a blurred idea and get it all flawed. Additionally, how do you explain the existence of the tilma at present? It ought to have been dust by now. The tilma is made from the fibers of a cactus plant ample regionally. It has a lifespan of 20 years! Additionally st cypryan, how do you figure you'll be able to examine a demonic witchcraft image utilized by mexican drug dealers as a so-referred to as protector to the Blessed Virgin Mary Mom Of God? There is absolutely no historical past to this santa muerte crap. 1st, a saint can only be attributed to a flesh and blood human being. How can a skeleton representing dying be a saint? You can argue that is represents a superb death, however that's only in accordance the the "brujas", "santeros" and whoever decides to dabble in witchcraft. This is not a Christian perception nor does it characterize Christianity in any method form or form. It is seen as an abhorration and the satanic world's try and "morph" this false icon into Catholicism.
emmaspeaks 4 years ago from Kansas City
Writer
Could you cite your sources, sir? I consider I cited mine. Your comment is useless drivel. Your beliefs are unfounded.
Pcunix four years ago from SE MA
His supply? Probably the Virgin Mary herself. Fourteenth hand, of course..
emmaspeaks four years in the past from Kansas Metropolis
Author
Yeah, obviously! Like coming to a gun combat with a knife. Unhappy.
John Sarkis 4 years ago from Los Angeles, CA
Great hub... I'm of Cuban origin and Cubans believe in "La Caridad del Cobre" which is the Cuban model of "Guadalupe..." Most international locations in Central/South America have their own private deities of the Virgin Mary and "Guadalupe" is the Mexican model of this Catholic custom...
Nice hub and informative at that....
John
Author
Thanks John! I am at present in school and nonetheless learning about all of Latin America, so I am sure I can be publishing more on other myths as effectively.
canito 4 years in the past
Devil rules the worldHe makes use of every means to his disposal (lies for many half) to insult GodAnd to deturn humans away from himWhat a disgrace that we quite believe crap just like the Guadalupe idol or the Santa Muerte than to attempt to be higher individuals to please has been written is from your acts that individuals will acknowledge whose disciples you areJudging from what is occurring in Mexico we are able to inform very easily.
emmaspeaks 4 years in the past from Kansas City
Writer
Your grammar is atrocious and so is your spelling. I am not even sure what precisely you are attempting to say. Thanks for the LULZ.
Eduardo 4 years ago
Very nicely written piece, emmaspeaks, congrats. And, in case you don't mind, listed here are a few minor corrections to the facts you mention:
1. Marcos Cipac de Aquino was not a creole (criollo). A "criollo" was someone born in Mexico from spanish parents; Marcos is supposed to be either native american (indio), or "mestizo", that is, one of many parents a spaniard, the opposite a native.
2. Juan de Zumárraga was IN TRUTH bishop of Mexico in 1531, appointed (advisable) by Charles V, but he had not acquired official consecration as a bishop.
I have been debating and, I would wish to assume, debunking the myth of the virgin of Guadalupe for a few years now amongst friends and peers and anyone prepared to listen to my heretical words. And I'm mexican, just attempt to think about the extent of opposition I can discover. :)
Anyway, simply needed to let you recognize that I believe your article is an excellent one.
emmaspeaks 4 years in the past from Kansas Metropolis
Writer
I do not say anywhere that Cipac is creole. Also, No, Zumarraga was not actually Bishop at the time. Try my sources, sir, but thanks for the remark.
Eduardo four years in the past
You're very welcome, and in regard to Cipac, you might be proper, my mistake. I read this: "The myth that supposedly occurred in 1531, was by no means even heard of till 1648 and was created by a Creole, not a Nahua Indian.", and erroneusly assumed you meant the painting. My apologies. Relating to Zumárraga's position as bishop, I disagree with you, but it is of no significance. Sustain the nice work.
Elam Jay Puhttos 4 years ago
mmm...
Elem Jay Puhttos four years in the past
OKAY Emma, here is the deal. Tonantzin (la virgen de Guadalupe) WAS CERTAINLY used by the Catholic Church to convert indigenous folks. As chances are you'll know, after the Spaniards "took over/conquered" the indigenous people, "los indios" did not just sit again and begin obeying these invaders. No, revolt after revolt they gave the "new leaders" a depressing life. Many indigenous individuals fled Tenochtitlan and continued their lives in rural areas (deserts, jungles, and many others.) and until at present they remain away from the nastiness of euro-based societies in Mexico. So, I imagine (and perhaps you agree) that this aparition DID occur but it surely had nothing to do with Christianity. Tonantzin spoke nahuatl to Juan Diego, not Spanish. This was a message for natives, not white people. How it obtained all intertwine.... nicely the people in people resolve what historical past must be told and the Spaniards stole this moment in native american historical past and made it theirs.... identical to the land. Agree?
emmaspeaks 4 years ago from Kansas Metropolis
Writer
Do I agree that this apparition actually ever happened? No. There's just manner too much proof contradicting it. As a history scholar, I've seen the evidence for and in opposition to and I can inform you that this apparition story is just not unlike some other apparition story. There may be nothing that stands out in this case. It's virtually textbook fraud. But thanks on your enter.
maria 4 years in the past
I've looked round for information about your claims and I see they've been very challenged. If you want to prove a case you must know greater than the people who find themselves claiming the other and it isn't easy since you are purported to be fairly nicely rounded. In this case some scientists from respected degrees earned in good universities or theologians or socio historic evaluation, in any other case what you are talking about only exhibits that you're a skeptical. In some instances skepticism is made by incorrect sloppy mendacious, solely half true claims or not good view of main sources that in the event that they were made by believers would for sure crush any potential consideration of sanity :-)d subsequently not a superb scholarship research aligned together with your claims and it will not matter how not documented or even right they are
emmaspeaks 4 years in the past from Kansas City
Creator
Where have you searched, Maria? I have cited my sources the place are yours? It's essential to not have looked too laborious. This subject has been wrote about extensively amongst scholars and I have researched it for fairly some time, so it could appear that the one whose analysis is lacking is yours.
Jess four years in the past
Hi Maria!
I was introduced up catholic. All through the years and by studying and studying about different cultures and religions I realized that I became very cynical about my very own faith. Half as a result of what I noticed, first hand, throughout my imposed "catholic devotion" and my must know more and query everything specially if nobody is aware of the story and tells you what they've been instructed. At 40 I've realized to ignore and I admired folks such as you who would go the additional mile to give you articles like this one. Keep in mind that convictions are more dangerous enemies that truths and lies, subsequently the traditions of those convictions turn out to be our safety, making us consider in absurdities and latter commit atrocities... "The most henious and the must cruel crimes of which historical past has report have been committed below the cover of religion or equally noble motives" Mohandas Okay Gandhi, Young India, July 7, 1950, quoted from Laird Wilcox, ed., The Degeneration of Belief”
And keep in mind:
Benjamin Disraeli Quote
Ernesto three years in the past
"Obeying the command he picked a number of flowers and put them in his tilma, kind of like a pancho".
It´s a poncho, not pancho. Pancho is the nickname for people referred to as Francisco.
Sure, residing in México and communicate against "La Virgencita" is like social suicide.......
Jav Sarab 3 years ago
this is just 1 piece of proof...On Might 7, 1979, Americans Dr. Philip Serna Callahan, a biophysicist on the College of Florida and an professional in infrared photography, and Jody B. Smith, a professor of aesthetics and philosophy at the College Pensacola, who're both specializing in painting and members of NASA, photographed the picture below infrared gentle and scanned at very excessive resolutions. After filtering and processing the digitized photographs to eliminate "noise" and improve them, they discovered that portions of the face, arms, robe, and mantle had been painted in one step, with no sketches, or corrections, and no visible brush strokes or sizing used to render the floor easy, no protective varnish masking the image to protect its surface. The Image changes in shade slightly in keeping with the angle of viewing, a phenomenon known as "Iridescence", a technique that cannot be reproduced with human palms. Scientists were unable to search out any trace of paint residue or dye of any sort on the Image and yet the the colors maintain their luminosity and brilliance. What produced the colors on Juan Diego's cloak or how they have been applied stays a total mystery of science. The standard of the pigments used for the pink dress, the blue veil, the face and the arms, or the permanence of the colours, or the vividness of the colors after a number of centuries, throughout which they ordinarily should have deteriorated, defy all scientific reasoning. The Image nonetheless retains its unique colours, regardless of being unprotected by any overlaying through the first one hundred years of exposure.
rob-bob three years in the past
thus far I see two contradictory pieces of "proof" and some coincidences which might be very handy.
1) The Bishop Z guy didn't mention this within the notes that we have now
2) this portray is lasting a really long time
It seems quite handy for this miracle to happen at a time when a bunch of people wanted to be transformed.
It also appears rather convenient that of all of the stuff I have investigated about this painting on both spiritual and scientific sides agrees that the rigor of this piece of labor is actually remarkable. I've not seen any scientific explanation for this, however not being an art historian my noting of this could be on account of my very own ignorance. Still, I've not seen it addressed.
I wonder why individuals who imagine in God who gifted them with the power to use logic and motive would be afraid of verifiable proof of human origin for the work. Then again I am amazed that given the Gulf of Tonkin incident I find it exhausting to consider that those that declare that the 9/11 attack in 2001 in New York and DC are without basis for his or her claim.
Conspiracies have happened up to now. Large coverups that had been later finally admitted to when overwhelming proof was shown.
If there may be a lot of proof that this is human-created and a variety of later-"found" proof to assist the divine creation of it, wouldn't a just God need us to make use of our divinely given gifts of notion to find out what what was actually occurring?
I am not saying miracles do not happen. Not saying they do. Simply saying that clear imaginative and prescient is a necessity.
Rose 3 years in the past
Kind of onerous to elucidate away the outcomes of NASA...
Additionally arduous to elucidate related discoveries made by Nobel- Prize successful scientist Richard Kuhn.
I might love to listen to somebody try.
jake 2 years ago
clearly...you have not executed any good research. you may check out any youtube movies and see that even NASA proved the colours made within the cloak was not of this earth. so get your details straight. simply saying boo.
jake 2 years in the past
clearly...you haven't completed any good research. you'll be able to try any youtube videos and see that even NASA proved the colours made in the cloak was not of this earth. so get your information straight. simply saying boo.
Cathy 2 years ago
This facts are fascinating, the problem here is that you just mentioned that it's undoubtedly a painting. Richard Kuhn a Nobel prize in chemistry decided that the pigments weren't of human, animal or vegetal origin, and when it was put to the laser there isn't a paint brushing, in truth for those who get three to four inches shut the image disappears. So it is closely disputed that could be a painting, in fact most scientist agree just isn't a painting. Second you missed to say that the primary time the Vatican studied it, they declared they couldn't affirm its origin which was the reason why mexico broke relationships with the Vatican. It wasn't after a number of scientific studies in the 90's once they agreedvto officialize it, so you cannot say it's a delicate subject for the Vatican as themselves they recognized lots of the details mentioned here.
David 2 years ago
The admiral Andrea Doria carried an image of Our Lady of Guadalupe with him through the battle of Lepanto, which took place in October of 1571. Furthermore, Miguel Sanchez' work was based mostly on the Nican Mopohua, a Nahuatl work documenting the apparition that was composed c. 1556. ( %C3%A7ol... So, it's false to say that prior to 1648 there was no written document of the looks of the Virgin of Guadalupe.
Alley 2 years ago
For the one who wrote this text. When you're not mexican this story means squat to you and you are not telling the truth. The fabric has been studied a whole lot of instances by scientist all around the world. And they can't find traces of paint paint strokes and the way the fabric remains to be in tact. So if you're not a scietist and have been to mexico to see the material yourself Sit the f down and cease writing shit that you do not know something about. Do some prolonged reserch you obviouly failed to read more.
Cindy 2 years ago
Let me start this offsaying that you simply state you wrote this to separate a truth from a myth, proper? To coach, am I appropriate? If this is so, then what I am going to say is to not convert you as a result of people convert themselves via inner religion, not by twisting of the arm or a couple of phrases we could sort. So why, if you're a college educated particular person, do you not carry widespread sense yourself? In case you are so sturdy within yourself in not being transformed, why is it important to try to persuade others that they're unsuitable? We Mexicans and Catholics are simply as sturdy within ourselves to keep believing in our religion. Why does it hassle you a lot that people have a religion? Is it so necessary to you that you need to read and write and dedicate so much of your time to it? Effectively we Guadalupanos thank you on your time and devotion to our Virgen of Guadalupe. Nonetheless, your so known as analysis relies, as you retain saying, on cited research. Analysis you have only read your self, not bodily carried out. Have you accomplished tangible research on the tilma? I haven't. However I additionally don't declare to be an professional when I am a scholar reading other peoples research. You stated yourself that you simply welcome the onslaught yet you additionally threaten to take away feedback not of your likings. You state that your cited sources are truth....yet, your sources are also so-known as consultants who've solely learn and written their own opinions based on issues they've read themselves. All you are doing is repeating it. How does that make you an expert and all realizing? I'm not an skilled in my faith, nor am I all realizing. But you have religion too. Religion that the Virgen de Guadalupe is a delusion. Your religion relies on cited sources. My faith is predicated on analysis stemmed from writings centuries in the past, very very similar to yours. We both believe our sources are true. You may have specialists, and so will we as said in comments above. If your purpose was to deliver gentle to what you believe is not true, you did a poor job. If you're going to attempt to persuade this Mexican Catholic that the Virgen de Guadalupe is not actual, you are going to need to do higher than just giving your written opinion based mostly off of belongings you simply read from others. Come again whenever you've completed your own bodily and scientific work.
Gonzalo Ramos Aranda 2 years ago
Les comparto a mi
tornas suaves las espinas
Benditos siempre tus pies,
nunca tocarán el suelo,
curando mi desconsuelo.
manos de la imploración,
de súplica, del perdón.
fe, esperanza, caridad,
aullentando la maldad.
quites penas, trago amargo,
que nunca nos desampares,
que cuides nuestros hogares.
bondad, la que tú descubres,
mes diciembre, tu día doce,
que de ti mi alma goce.
Autor: Lic. Gonzalo Ramos Aranda
México, D. F., a 12 de diciembre del 2012.
Dedicado al Sr. Ing. José Guillermo Romero Aguilar.
Reg. SEP. Indautor No. 03-2013-051712171201-14
Del DF en Chicago 2 years ago
Soy Mexicano, and as because the nationality implies, Native American , descendant of Nahuatl -Mexica Certainly there aren't any known writings of the "Virgen de Gualalupe" by anyone involved within the supposed apparition The primary writings occurred many years after the supposed ocurance much so just like the ocurance of Jesus Christ. The Roman and Jewish folks concerned within the ocurance have been totally silent in regards to the event. Writings, as effectively, happened a long time after the supposed ocurance. There's a virgin in Spain by the identical identify Guadalupe. Guada comes from the Arabic name for river and lupe from the Latin lupus= wolf, due to this fact wolf river. Yes the Spanish used something at their disposal to manage the Mexicans and steal as much as they may, how handy for the Virgin to look the place they were already congregating usually to hope to the Mexican Goddes Tonatzin. Identical to how handy was it to set the start of Christ when the Roman Empire was already celebrating the feast to Sol Invictus, at the winter solstice.
Human weakness lends itself to invent every kind of tales (religions) for cosmology to have a connection with the immense energy that nature is.
Every faith believes that it is the true religion and pray to the true god, how can this be? There is just one reply to this question.!!!
Our Mexican faith states that the Gods gave their life for us and as such it was the accountability of the " Chosen" Mexicans to maintain the human race alive by likewise sacrificing people Thereby working towards human sacrifice, the same factor because the Christian religious birth, by sacrificing Jesus. Very comparable stories.
Yes, it has been an unmet problem to seek out contemporaneous written data for both the Virgen de Guadalupe and Jesus Christ In actual fact at one time it was punished by death to query these issues, it was blasphemy. The Inquisition was not only practiced in Europe but in addition in the Americas and the sequelae nonetheless remain, some people still are unable to question these points.
Mikey Amaro 2 years ago
Can you please cite your article appropriately.
I'm engaged on a analysis paper and this information is good for my paper just that I am having some trouble citing the article.
MLA Format:
- For an individual page on a Site, listing the author or alias if known, adopted by the data coated above for entire Web sites. Keep in mind to use n.p. if no publisher title is accessible and n.d. if not publishing date is given. -
Example:
"The right way to Make Vegetarian Chili." eHow, n.d. Web. 24 Feb. 2009
Mark B 2 years in the past
"No point out until 1648". Not true. The entire historical past was recorded in the 1548 Codex, written in Nahuatl, which has been scientifically authenticated. This was written a mere 8 years after the event. So much for fable and fabrication. Juan Diego was a historic one who in actual fact witnessed the occasions attributed to him, as did all the others recounted in the historical past of the occasion.
The concept the Virgin of Guadalupe is just a baptized Tonantzin is ridiculous. She was a vicious, blood thirsty, demonic goddess with a head fabricated from snakes. The concept either the Indians or the Christians would accept one as the opposite is laughable. If something she is like the alternative, the nemesis of the brutal goddess. It's more likely that the very identify refers to the crushing of evil, such because the blood thirst for human sacrifice of the Aztec gods. "Coatlaxopeuh" or "quatlasupe", whereas Nahuatl sounds remarkably like the Spanish phrase Guadalupe, however means the one "who crushes the serpent."
As to Del in DF's declare in regards to the events of Christianity, the earliest writings on Christ have been a mere 15 years after the demise and resurrection. And as Paul recounts, there have been more than 500 witnesses at one time to the resurrected Christ, most of whom were alive on the time of his writing.
Cesar Cantu 2 years ago
I don't know why individuals are so blinded in false faith to the plain. The paint is peeling off just by taking a look at it you can see it.
D Guerrero 2 years ago
What's your clarification as to why a cloth that will usually only final 20 years, has lasted over four hundred years? There have been replicas made on the same type of material and so they've lasted between eight-10 years before fading and falling apart.
alexnet 2 years in the past
Well....nicely...the place is emmaspeaks (the hub creator) verify above the very slap in the face given by Jav Sarab 10 months ago, with plenty of "cited sources"...once more emmaspeaks did you buried your head now like an ostrich...????
Pachis Bal 2 years ago
YOU PROBABLY HAVE SUPPOSEDLY RESEARCHED THE HISTORIC FATS, BE SORT ENOUGH TO PUT IN WRITING THE WORDS CORRECLY A PANCHO IS A PERSON AND A PONCHO IS NOTHING LIKE THE TILMA.
I UNDERSTAND YOUR LACK OD BELIEF, BUT DON'T, BENEATH
ANY CIRCUMSTANCES AGREE WITH YOU.
RESPECTFULLY
Rich 2 years ago
We have not heard from Emma in a very long time. I believe she failed out of college. She was very mean and hurtful,,, apart from being improper. Watch the film referred to as "the blood & the Rose"
Omar 2 years ago
To begin with, I am Mexican and was raised Catholic however am not non secular at all. I agree together with your article. It fully is smart that the Spaniards would create a "miracle" to transform the natives to Catholicism shortly after conquest. I don't believe in religion, much much less the Virgen of Guadalupe.
The issue with speaking out against the Virgin in Mexico is that you're principally taking away their hope, their strength. One factor that they still imagine is sweet on this world. Sadly, the "non-believers" are outnumbered. Though, issues are altering right here in Mexico as older generations die off.
Adrian 2 years in the past
Hrlascruces 2 years in the past
I'm having this dialogue with somebody very near me. Whether or not or not Our Woman appeared in Mexico is not material to our salvation. I really do not perceive why folks who haven't accepted that this happened care. It is fascinating that they do not consider it happened and really feel that as a result of they imagine it is a hoax that the believers one way or the other are stupid. To those that imagine it is a hoax, that is tremendous. For these of us who imagine it, that's wonderful too. It is our religion. We love our mother and we believe she appeared. We believe that miracles happen, so what is your objection? Even the Church does not require the faithful to imagine in personal revelations. You can be Catholic and not accept this personal revelation. I accept it because I really like my Church, and my Church performed in depth investigations and declared that the Virgin de Guadalupe is worthy of a special place within the minds and hearts of the devoted. I trust the Catholic Church far more than I trust, with due respect to the writer of this text. Before you say it let me preempt you by admitting that the Catholic Church and the boys who run it have made terrible mistakes, however that doesn't mean the good majority of what the Church teaches is fallacious. In life now we have very few things we are able to depend on. I've discovered peace and reality inside the Catholic Church and it makes me glad. Please, if you assume the Virgin of Guadalupe is a hoax, tremendous, I get it, however why is it so vital to you to attempt to persuade me in any other case. For every story that show it is a hoax there's one which exhibits the other. Let's conform to disagree and permit one another to get pleasure from our beliefs or our alternative to not consider. I used to be a non-believer as soon as, and now I imagine. That may be a miracle insandofitself. God Bless
Hrlascruces 2 years in the past
To Del DF en Chicago:
As soon as again why are you so pained that we believe Our Woman appeared in Mexico. My tackle that is you can fool some of the folks some of the time but you can't idiot all the individuals all the time. THOUSANDS AND THOUSANDS of indigenous individuals transformed............tens of millions not tons of, not hundreds, HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS. Were the Aztecs stupid? Were they inferior? Not by any stretch of the imagination. In fact historical past reveals us that in many ways they were superior to the Europeans who got here to the brand new world. So for me, the truth that her "alleged look" changed the world is of serious consequence. God Bless
Fernando 2 years in the past
I don't perceive why mexicans get all offended when they are confronted with the reality. she is telling us a fact, actual evidence. has anybody of you may have seen or touch the material. I'm sure noooooot.
Anna 20 months ago
How do you clarify the conservation of such an artifact? The painting of her was very clearly been tampered with a number of times and is several hundreds of years outdated. How do you clarify its current state of preservation? Also in analysis, there a microscopic pictures imprinted within the eyes. How do you clarify that?
GEORGE ROMERO 19 months ago
The shrine to Our Lady of Guadalupe was a very powerful Marian shrine within the medieval kingdom of Castile. It's revered within the monastery of Santa María de Guadalupe, in today's Cáceres province of the Extremadura autonomous neighborhood of Spain.
The unique carving is Romanesque, made of cedar wooden, which in accordance with historic legend was found by a shepherd named Gil Cordero, a resident of Cáceres, whom he appeared next to the Guadalupe River, who took the name the Virgin and the folks. Based on that legend, the image had been centuries in the past by the physique of San Lucas, exposed in Rome and Seville, until in 714, in full Muslim conquest, the picture was hidden subsequent to Guadalupejo river, title that comes from the union from the Arabic word "wad" (river) and the "lux-speculum" (mirror mild) Latin contraction, where he remained until his finding by Gil Lamb.
The title of the Mexican Woman of Guadalupe derives from the Extremadura, homeland of many conquistadors, together with Hernán Cortés.
In Mexico there is a homonymous invocation, whose roots lie in Extremadura. Based on some theories the title of the Mexican Virgin was placed as a result of the Bishop Juan de Zumarraga then had difficulty pronouncing his identify in Nahuatl, Coatlaxopeuh, and referred to as it "La Virgen de Guadalupe" as a result of "Coatlaxopeuh" sounded just like the name by which the Extremadura used to invoke the Virgin. However, this doesn't match the phonetic similarities proposals imply "that crushes the serpent stone" or "treading the pinnacle of the snake", as in the image on the tilma in Mexico there isn't any snake. Nevertheless, the document Nican Mopohua, written in lifetime of Juan Diego in Nahuatl language, the name of Santa María de Guadalupe is clearly transcribed in Spanish. Fo extra data you can learn with more particulars at:
Lori sixteen months ago
How can a TILMA, made with cactus fibers, still be in tact? That in itself is a miracle. NASA has confirmed their findings in her veil. There are too many things going on in the actual tilma that was far too advanced for again then and now trendy expertise can prove this. I really like how fashionable science can't disprove their findings within the tilma. A gorgeous story. You'll be able to't combat science. So many individuals publish without knowing any modern-day info concerning the TILMA. The Virgin Mary has appeared to many people throughout time as many names and has looked different every time. Can someone inform ms. Emma why Juan Diego did not write the story himself or is it that obvious only to my 5 12 months previous daughter? Some need to see to believe, others have their religion and sadly some have proven info (by scientists) earlier than their eyes and still fail to believe. God bless!
human 14 months in the past
I will take the low street by stating the apparent. Solely a mentally problem moron would consider that this painted piece of cloth is something particular. The individuals using "science" to help this load of bull must take a refresher course about science. Science would not take care of absolutes. Science doesn't cope with the supernatural (since it doesn't exist). Science deals with the best out there explanation based on falsifiable proof. And people like Lori pervert science trying to use it to prove this nonsense. As a closing word, you spiritual nut jobs should attempt proving that your sky fairy daddy exists first earlier than making an attempt to say miracles in its hole and empty title. Otherwise you come across as less than educated.
Kiki 14 months in the past
Nicely if u look it up it'll say she has a devil image in the event you have a look at the image of her look all the best way in the bottom where the angel is holding her and you'll find "horns" just like the devil it is like long and black
kmurf thirteen months ago
Researcher and physicist Dr. Aldofo Orozco informed participants at the Worldwide Marian Congress on Our Woman of Guadalupe that there isn't any scientific rationalization for the 478 years of top quality-preservation of the Tilma or for the miracles which have occurred to ensure its preservation.
Dr. Orozco began his discuss by confirming that the conservation of the Tilma, the cloak of St. Juan Diego on which Our Woman of Guadalupe appeared 478 years ago, is completely past any scientific explanation.”
All the cloths much like the Tilma which were placed in the salty and humid environment across the Basilica have lasted not more than ten years,” he defined. One painting of the miraculous image, created in 1789, was on display in a church close to the basilica the place the Tilma was positioned. This portray was made with the very best techniques of its time, the copy was stunning and made with a fabric very similar to that of the Tilma. Also, the picture was protected with a glass because it was first placed there.”
Nevertheless, eight years later, the copy of the picture of Our Girl of Guadalupe was thrown away as a result of the colors were fading and threads had been breaking. In contrast, Orozco stated, the unique Tilma was uncovered for about 116 years without any form of safety, receiving all the infrared and ultraviolet radiation from the tens of hundreds of candles near it and uncovered to the humid and salty air across the temple.”
Dr. Orozco then mentioned the Tilma's material. He noted that one of the crucial bizarre characteristics of the material is that the back aspect is rough and coarse, but the front facet is ‘as gentle as probably the most pure silk, as noted by painters and scientists in 1666, and confirmed one century later in 1751 by the Mexican painter, Miguel Cabrera.”
Following an evaluation of a number of the fibers in 1946, it was concluded that the fibers came from the Agave plant, however, noted Dr. Orozco, the researchers couldn't work out which of the a hundred seventy five Agave species the Tilma was made out of. Years later, in 1975, the famous Mexican researcher Ernesto Sodi Pallares said that the species of the agave was Agave popotule Zacc,” Orozco explained, however we don't understand how he reached this conclusion.”
Before concluding his presentation, Dr. Orozco made point out of two miracles associated with the Tilma.
The primary occurred in 1785 when a employee unintentionally spilled a 50 % nitric acid solvent on the correct aspect of the material. In addition to any natural explanation, the acid has not destroyed the material of the material, certainly it has not even destroyed the coloured parts of the picture,” Orozco said.
The second miracle was the explosion of a bomb close to the Tilma in 1921. Dr. Orozco recalled that the explosion broke the marble floor and widows one hundred fifty meters from the explosion, however unexpectedly, neither the Tilma nor the traditional glass that protected the Tilma was damaged or broken.” The one damage close to it was a brass crucifix that was twisted by the blast.
He continued, There are not any explanations why the shockwave that broke windows 150 meters afar didn't destroy the normal glass that protected the image. Some individuals said that the Son via the brass crucifix protected the picture of His Mother. The actual reality is that we do not have a natural clarification for this event.”
Anahi 10 months in the past
Nobody was there when all this happened so anybody can consider or not. this article is clearly not utterly true, like I mentioned no one was bodily there to explain such story as "the truth" or "the myth". So if anyone believes, they're free to consider, if anybody thinks its a myth then life goes on.
Emilia McCoy 7 months ago
Hello, I like your hub, I simply have one advice, before you publish one thing with words not in your native lenguage,is at all times a good idea to offer it to somebody who knows the vocabulary higher than you. I am Mexican and I am not insulted at all concerning the Guadalupana part at all, however I am very disillusioned about your use of the Nahuatl phrase. You write it more than twice and isn't "Nahua" is Nahuatl. And your HUB is enlightening, however most mexicans aren't open to details, they imagine more in fantasy stories.
Gagne 7 weeks in the past
This text is a joke!
zero of 8192 characters used
sending
Please fee this text using the size beneath. The size is from 1 to 10, where 10 is one of the best and 1 is the worst.
Your Rating: ?

Copyright © 2016 HubPages Inc. and respective homeowners.
Other product and firm names proven could also be emblems of their respective house owners.
HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc.
HubPages and Hubbers (authors) could earn income on this page based mostly on affiliate relationships and commercials with partners together with Amazon, Google, and others.