Chance

Chance

So what is the chance that a coin will land heads when flipped? Scientists say there's a 50% probability. Is that this essentially so although?
From reading my different articles it must be clear that one theory of our universe that I'm significantly inquisitive about is consensus actuality. A universe created by our collective consciousness that fits throughout the confines of our collective perception methods.
I typically feel that science shouldn't be so much determining present legal guidelines of the universe as is often thought, but in some respects creating the laws itself by way of self-reinforcement within the acutely aware minds that regularly preserve the structure and behavior of this planet.
While you toss a coin, your unconscious beliefs dictate that, when you toss it sufficient, it is going to come up tails eventually. The concept of likelihood, probability and chaos are so effectively rooted in everybody's minds that it's unimaginable to persuade yourself that you have the ability to make that coin show heads each time.
If you do the experiment yourself, say tossing a coin one thousand occasions trying to will the coin to be heads, and logging the results as you go, it's possible you'll discover after the first 50 tosses that there was a reasonably giant bias in the direction of the coin developing heads, for e.g
Heads Tails
31 19
Odd? Not really, mathematicians and statisticians will inform you that when you proceed tossing the coin, and more data is amassed, that the tosses will average out more.
That's totally doable, and if we're to imagine that the bodily world follows the legal guidelines of probability as rigidly as they are saying, probable.
However... this experiment has been insurmountably tainted by the preconceptions of the particular person finishing up the experiment. If that individual, with 100% full faith that that coin WOULD land heads each single time, really had the ability to make that occur, there isn't a manner they would EVER find that power out, because a hundred% religion is impossible with the conditioning of randomness and probability concepts since the day they have been born. Probably the most religion you'll be able to realistically ever have that it'll land heads is... nicely, 50% actually.
When you managed to convince your self 100% that you just had the power to influence the coin toss, after which tossed the coin and it came up heads, what are the probabilities” that it's going to come up heads on the second toss? 50% still. It is counter intuitive, as you'll assume that there is much less probability of it arising heads once more if it already has executed, however chance states that the second time (or any other time) you toss that coin, it still has 50% chance of being heads.
Regardless of this, when tossing the coin a second time, you would be aware that you simply had just obtained a heads, and this niggling doubt would imply that you just were no longer one hundred% satisfied that you might make the coin come up heads once more. You toss it again... Heads! Unbelievable...
That's two heads in a row, possibly there's one thing to this?
Time to toss once more. You're still keen it to be heads, but you may feel your conviction and religion waning this time...
Heads again! Three in a row! That's 12.5% chance given conventional views of probability. About 1/10, fairly fortunate I suppose, but not exceptionally inconceivable...
Subsequent toss. 4 heads in a row could be pretty unlikely, 6.25% probability, taking into account the irrefutable laws of likelihood. Your confidence in this coin toss will not be excessive at all... This time, it should be tails!
You toss once more... Doh! Tails... informed you! It's just random.
But what if no-one had ever instructed you about probability? What if at schools, pupils were taught that nothing was random, however was merely configured by the consensus of conscious minds observing it, primarily based upon their beliefs on the result?
Would these kids, upon reaching adulthood, have the ability to toss a coin a thousand instances and it come up heads each single time?
Maybe, maybe not. However my point is that seemingly provable scientific experiments might have their outcomes contaminated by the belief of the persons doing the experimentation.
If scientists imagine that they are unable to influence chance, then the outcomes they may glean will assist this perception, whether that's as a result of they are right, or as a result of they are mistaken however consider they're right.
Imagine if everybody in the nation put the same numbers on the lottery, and watched the draw satisfied I'm going to win this week I can really feel it!”
Would the possibilities of these numbers coming out still be tens of millions to 1?
Possibly, perhaps not.
However then again, scientists will freely settle for that quantum particles can be influenced merely by our observations and expectations. So why not visible matter constructed of those quantum particles? As a result of its simpler for them to accept strange goings-on with an invisible sub-atomic particle than it's with something they can see, really feel, taste, and contact like a coin or a dice. If they do not see anything that helps this perception, they won't believe it. But when belief is what makes it happen, then they are never going to see it in experimentation.
If perception is the important thing to defining our reality, then whereas we retain a steadfast and narrow belief system, be that faith, science, or a mixture of the 2, then we're severely narrowing the probabilities open to us in this actuality. We need to reset our brains again to zero. View every part from provable” and observable” science to spiritual or religious philosophies as a child would, from a impartial place the place you'll be able to freely discover them as prospects, but be in a place where you may also explore the other conflicting areas of risk with out contaminating them, or rendering them invisible, with your individual preconceptions.
For those who get in to a actuality too deeply, you will believe in that actuality to the purpose where you will routinely dismiss every other actuality introduced to you... that is harmful
, especially when you consider that the truth you're part of could have been devised with a malevolent intent.

IN REGARDS TO THE CREATOR
Mail him on info@ with any comments on this article.